vaccine discussion
- Pharma took a toxic protein (Spike) known since the 1990s.
- Then, adjusted its code to make it more genetically invasive (furin cleavage).
- Then, packaged it into a vehicle designed to invade cellular life (lipid nanoparticles).
"We now know that spike protein, although people want to ignore & deny it, actually activates many genetic pathways, which lead to cancer, & it's a form of cancer called 'turbo cancers.'" @drpaulmarik1
Arguments for vaccines
-
The vaccines are perfectly safe and effective
-
Vaccination should be mandatory for the rest of humanity's sake.
-
It is just like the polio vaccine and look how good that was
-
Vaccines prevent dying
-
Vaccines prevent hospitalization
-
Vaccines reduce the severity
-
Unvaccinated individuals should be isolated from others
-
Vaccines prevent you from acquiring the disease from other vaccinated individuals. But you can still acquire the disease from an unvaccinated individual - both need to be vaccinated.
-
Vaccines prevent the hospitals from being overrun and the taxing of the health care system.
-
Vaccines help us develop herd immunity
Arguments against the vaccines
-
Not everyone dies from the disease and consequently not everyone needs the vaccine.
-
The vaccines do not prevent tranmission. Either receiving it or passing it to others if you are infected
-
The pre-clinical trials did not look at effectiveness against mortality, hospitalization, severity nor transmission. They focussed solely on the count of symptoms and only demonstrated a reduction in count.
-
The vaccines were not safe. Overwhelming number of adverse events - in the millions reported. Unknown number went unreported.
-
Vaccines are exempt from double-blind placebo testing during clinical pre-trials.
-
Natural immunity is far superior to vaccination and is proven in study after study.
-
There are many successful treatments which were show to improve the outcome of the disease and are cheap and effective.
-
There do not appear to be any excess mortality during the first year which was without vaccines. There are now significant mortality which correlates with increased vaccination and it is growing each year even though vaccine uptake has practically vanished.
-
evidence of the incentivisation of vaccine use being given to health care providers
-
The harmful outcomes of the vaccines were well known before emergency approval was granted and were absent from the discussions. Pamplets with a long list of side affects were included with the vaccine but were not shown or discussed with patients. Patients did not get informed consent.
-
Governments considered individuals in the healthcare system as unvaccinated within the last 15 days with the result that all adverse events from the vaccinated were counted as unvaccinated.
-
The treatments administered to those that caught the disease were causing deaths such as respirators, medazolam, and removal of antibiotics.
-
Patents going back 20 years. Event 201, a preparedness exercise was held three months before the lockdowns so it was a planned and coordinated response. If it truly was an existential threat then that looks like prudence, however if it was a scam, then that looks like culpability. The theatre coming out of China at the time. Seniors dying in record numbers in Italy which coincided with a recent vaccination program
100% of the deaths had comorbidities, 99% had 2 or more comorbidities. Canada wide Average 85% were residents of LTC facilities (93% in Quebec) 80% of the deaths were individuals 80 or older. 10% in the 70-80 range, and 10% under 70. Highly targetted group and it was false to claim that the general public were at risk. This was known at the time. Also false to claim that vaccines saved lives because these extremely unhealthy individuals did not get the vaccine. So the very ones that died of Covid were unable to receive the vaccine.
This is the stated requirment made by the FDA for emergency approval and the submissions only looked at symptom counts. These are public records
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of
https://romanbystrianyk.substack.com/p/60-years-of-failing-flu-vaccines
Years later - no impact on mortality
"We could not correlate increasing vaccination coverage after 1980 with declining mortality rates in any age group. Because fewer than 10% of all winter deaths were attributable to influenza in any season, we conclude that observational studies substantially overestimate vaccination benefit." Impact of Influenza Vaccination on Seasonal Mortality in the US Elderly Population
"After the late 1980s, no decline in age-adjusted excess mortality was associated with increasing influenza vaccination distribution primarily targeted for the elderly." Influenza-related mortality in the Italian elderly: No decline associated with increasing vaccination coverage
Claims of Effectiveness Sources
"Results: Vaccine effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines to prevent COVID-19-associated hospitalizations included: 85% (95% CI: 82 to 88%) for 2 vaccine doses against Alpha; 85% (95% CI: 83 to 87%) for 2 doses against Delta; 94% (95% CI: 92 to 95%) for 3 doses against Delta; 65% (95% CI: 51 to 75%) for 2 doses against Omicron; and 86% (95% CI: 77 to 91%) for 3 doses against Omicron.
Among hospitalized unvaccinated COVID-19 patients, severity on the WHO Clinical Progression Scale was higher for Delta than Alpha (adjusted proportional odds ratio [aPOR] 1.28, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.46), and lower for Omicron than Delta (aPOR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.77). Compared to unvaccinated cases, severity was lower for vaccinated cases for each variant, including Alpha (aPOR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.49), Delta (aPOR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.51), and Omicron (aPOR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.85). Conclusions: mRNA vaccines were highly effective in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalizations from Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants, but three vaccine doses were required to achieve protection against Omicron similar to the protection that two doses provided against Delta and Alpha. Among adults hospitalized with COVID-19, Omicron caused less severe disease than Delta, but still resulted in substantial morbidity and mortality. Vaccinated patients hospitalized with COVID-19 had significantly lower disease severity than unvaccinated patients for all the variants."
disease mortality
Clinical Severity and mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness for Omicron, Delta, and Alpha SARS-CoV-2 Variants in the United States: A Prospective Observational Study
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.06.22270558v1
A test negative design study in Ontario
Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe covid-19 outcomes in Ontario, Canada.
This study was given to me to support the claim that these vaccines improve the severity of outcome. They claim that the unvaccinated are 16 times more likely to be hospitalized and die than the vaccinated. It also seems to be a technical reference used by the mainstream media, such as the Ottawa Citizen, who also are making similar claims. But is this true.
My own conclusions
Anyone can make a claim but to be scientific, it has to be supported by evidence - observable and repeatable by others. We have the claim for effectiveness here but we can not see how they arrived at their results so it can not be considered proof, just their word. They even say that their work can not be replicated by others because of the restricted access to the data citing confidentiality. However, the confidentialy reasons are bogus because you don't need to identify a person, you just need a bit of meta data on each patient such as age, vax status, comorbidity, symptoms etc to perform this analysis. You don't need anything that would identify them. You don't even need to know which hospital unless you are also examining this across economic sectors which they did here, but that is tangential to the core question and could easily have been removed.
So this is the fundamental flaw with this study. Without showing their calculations in their analysis we have no way of knowing if this is correct or errors were made, and the wrong conclusions drawn. Having read this several times I have zero confidence in their claim. It fails as supporting evidence, and so it is just another opinion piece, just dressed up to look sciency.
This is not evidence and can not be used to support the claim.
Furthermore, it appears on a somewhat prestigious science journal database which has a reputation for peer-reviewed science. This does not appear to have been peer reviewed, how could it have been. It looks more like science theatre - all the appearance of science but without the science.
Finally, the problem with these studies is who funded the study and did they get what they paid for. This study was commissioned from Ontario Health, but it was not conducted by their employees or by contractors. It was through an endowment grant. Which always feels like money laundering to me. A pharma company can not commission such a study directly, because it would obviously look bad. So they give the endowment to a university or in this case, a public organization to give the appearance of being arms length. But is it really?
How they marshalled their data
- Used individuals that were pcr tested positives, negatives were the control
- hospital admission, or death with recent positive test
- n=2,171,449 people tested. 40% removed as priors? (not sure why they were removed or what affect this has on results).
- 24% were asymptomatic and 15% symptomatic
- of the 324,033 people with symptoms who were tested, 53 270 (16.4%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 42 567 (79.9%) had information available on tests for variants, 21 272 (6.6%) had received at least one dos of mRNA vaccine, and 4 894 (1.5%) had received two doses (table 1).
- Among test positive cases, 2 479 (4.7%) had a severe outcome, of whom 2 035 were admitted to hospital and 444 died.
What they concluded
"Estimates for both full and partial vaccination were about 10 percentage points higher against hospital admission or death than against symptomatic infection."
"We observed an effectiveness against symptomatic infection of 63%""
"In our study, we observed an increased risk of infection 7-13 days after vaccination. Thus, the generalisability of our findings to the broader population is uncertain and we could not estimate vaccine effectiveness against asymptomatic infection."
Questions it raised while I was reading
- how many died that were vaccinated. Ontario guidelines consider those vaccinated under 14 days as un-vaccinated,
- how many died that were not vaccinated, truly unvaccinated
- did they include deaths in the first two weeks from the date of vaccination
- role that comorbidities played which we know is crucial
- does the vax skew the pcr test results?
- was this really peer reviewed? feels like it wasn't. How could it be with the analysis missing. What were their comments about it? That would be so interesting to read.
- look at the rolling totals for vax uptake, starts almost zero
- Look at the ratio pos to neg,
- starts 7.8 vs 10.1 when no vax
- ends 24.9 vs 15.2 when 40.1 vax vs 15.1 unvax it flipped!!!!
- why is comorbid missing from Table 1! so relevent here
- why symptomatic focus for this study? question the focus of the study when we know that c19 targetted comorbids and age,and most specifically residents of Long Term Care facilities. also know that most people are asymptomatic
- what were the percentage of hospitialization and death overall
"Among adults aged ≥70 years, vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection after one dose was observed to be 64%" What does "effectiveness" actually mean here? hospitalization? death? Don't think so. Suspicious that they are referring to a count of symptoms, which was required for FDA approval, rather than an actual measure of severity.
Retraction of scientific papers
The purpose of this study was to analyze, for the first time, the subjective views of researchers whose papers were retracted. Study participants are active researchers, most with international reputations in their respective fields. They perceived retraction as a means of censoring and silencing critical voices with the aim of preserving the pro-vaccination agenda of interested parties. Participants also reported additional measures aimed at harming them personally and professionally. These findings point to the need for a fair, open, and honest discourse about the safety of vaccines for the benefit of public health and the restoration of trust in science and medicine.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09581596.2021.1878109?journalCode=ccph20
Risk/Benefits of Vaccines
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of
Common Outcomes for Vaccines
A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30483-7/fulltext
"These vaccine types include viral vector-based vaccines, COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines, inactivated or attenuated virus vaccine, and protein-based vaccines. In viral vector-based vaccines, adenovirus is used to deliver a part of SARS-COV-2 genome to human cells. Human cells use this genetic material to produce SARS-COV-2 spike protein. Human body recognizes this protein to start a defensive response. The mRNA-based vaccines consist of SARS-COV-2 RNA. Once introduced, genetic material helps in making SARS-COV-2-specific protein. This protein is recognized by human body to start defensive immune reaction. In inactivated or attenuated vaccines, killed or attenuated SARS-COV-2 virus triggers immune response. Protein-based vaccines use the spike protein or its fragments for inciting immune response. The most devastating neurological post-vaccination complication is cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Cerebral venous sinus is frequently reported in females of childbearing age, generally following adenovector-based vaccination. Another major neurological complication of concern is Bell’s palsy that was reported dominantly following mRNA vaccine administration. Acute transverse myelitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and acute demyelinating polyneuropathy are other unexpected neurological adverse events that occur as result of phenomenon of molecular mimicry. Reactivation of herpes zoster in many persons, following administration of mRNA vaccines, has been also recorded. "
Spectrum of neurological complications following COVID-19 vaccination
(https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10072-021-05662-9)
Ethics
The Ethical Significance of Post‑Vaccination COVID‑19 Transmission Dynamics
(https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11673-022-10223-6)
"The potential for vaccines to prevent the spread of infectious diseases is crucial for vaccination policy and ethics. In this paper, I discuss recent evidence that the current COVID-19 vaccines have only a modest and short-lived effect on reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and argue that this has at leastfour important ethical implications. First, getting vaccinated against COVID-19 should be seen primarily as a self-protective choice for individuals. Second, moral condemnation of unvaccinated people for causing direct harm to others is unjustified. Third, the case for a harm-based moral obligation to get vaccinated against COVID-19 is weak. Finally, and perhaps most significantly, coercive COVID-19 vaccination policies (e.g., measures that exclude unvaccinated people from society) cannot be directly justified by the harm principle."
Asymmetric Risk from Covid
The majority of deaths from C19 in the first wave were residents of Long Term Facilities. All had comorbidities, the most commone being obesity.Covid-19 does not strike indescrimanently.
A few blood-serum tests that occured before the roll out of vaccines showed that the vast majority of the population already had antibodies to the coronavirus. No effort was made to check whether a particular patient needed the vaccine before administering it. Furthermore, studies show natural immunty is superiour to vaccine immunity.
The creation of an "emergency" led to the rushing of the vaccine before clinical trials had been undertaken.
The safety data appeared in the FDA slide deck and VAERS
The bar for effectiness was set very low
The Fallacy of Universal Protection
The protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn’t work for the protected.
Don't hate people for being unvaccinated - they were just born that way.
A vaccine is just a commercial product yet it seems to have been given special status - almost life-giving qualities.
If the Vax were 90% effective at saving lives we would expect deaths to be 10% of what they were before vaccines. And since the vast majority of deaths were residents of Long Term Care Facilities (93%) and which had comorbidities (99%), then this is actually saving old people from dying. We just may have found the fountain of eternal youth!
But the truth is, for 99.9% (now 99.97%) of Canadians, the vaccination will do nothing to save their life, simply because they were not in danger of dying.
Another way to look at it is the vax will not save the lives of 99.9% of people in Canada so it is wasted on them. Its actually worse than this because in any given year most people will not even come into contact with C19. Do we know how many actually will? If positive tests are an indication and it seems to be the only indication that we have, and that the number of cases last year were around 6%. But people are tested multiple times and each time is considered a new case so even that number should be reduced in half or thirds, say 2 or 3%
That is the fallacy of the vax as a therapeutic. It's value for most people is very questionable. Most drugs are given to people that need it. I.e. antibiotics, if and when you have an infection. We don’t give antibiotics to the entire population in case someone might have an infection later that year.
On top of that, they have turned the vax into a subscription service, multiple doses in a year. Really, this is collective insanity.
Lipid Nanoparticle Studies
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=lipid+nanoparticle&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=
- Not a sufficient emergency
- Not a question of deaths from a particular virus, it is a question of an extraordinary difference
- deaths mostly occurred in LTC and advanced ages and comorbidities
- deaths were within the range of deaths of prior years
For my part I see that mortality is essentially unchanged from pre covid so it means the cause of death is being attributed differently rather than it being additional deaths. This is more of an administrative change rather than a pandemic. I did an analysis of the mortality data from StatsCan, CDC and Euromomo a year ago. There are no excess deaths from Covid and this is so unlike historic pandemics which rapidly killed
We are essentially at zero deaths from Covid at this time but they are using “cases“ as a metric for disease spread, as a reason for more non-pharmaceutical interventions, but is it? What is a “case”? It is certainly not a sick person as most cases are asymptomatic. Is it a measure of how widespread the disease is from testing samples of the population? Then why use the total number of positives rather than dividing by the number of tests performed to get the rate of positivity?
People are being coerced into taking an experimental drug that skipped the normal safety and effectiveness trials because of the emergency and the early data is not looking so good. We have never seen a vaccine with this level of adverse affects. It is literally off the scale and the trials should have been discontinued under normal circumstances. It doesn’t even seem to be getting any attention which is strange given the hyperfocus on variants, cases and people dying that tested positive for covid.
Age stratification is being ignored as the risk to the under 65yo group is lower than the risk from seasonal influenza, yet they are being coerced into taking the experimental vaccine. The adverse affects on this age group is disheartening and these just may be additional deaths.
Asymptomatics are being blamed for the spread. Which is only somewhat true. Anyone that has come into contact with the virus is possibly a spreader but that includes whether you had the vaccine or not. Either one are spreaders. The super spreaders are the really sick ones but they are being hospitalized and not walking among the general population.
Covid zero seems to be the strategy as if it can be irradicated by vaccines just like we did with smallpox. Coronavirus is nothing like the smallpox virus or any of the other childhood diseases for that matter.
Vaccine passport and the social constructs for a two tiered society, those that comply and those that opt out. It is more of a social compliance mechanism rather than a health regime. And we can see where the idea came from. Childhood diseases such as Diptheria, Small pox etc seem to have been eradicated from mass vacinnations. The preoblem is that the Coronavirus is not the same beast as
The problem with the current public policy is it is based on germ theory and the notion that covid-zero is possible and will save us. This is simply not true.
The weak argument with germ theory is that it overlooks and ignores some pretty solid science and promotes germ avoidance as a solution. A competing theory called Terrain Theory attempts to solve those limitations. Like germ theory it recognizes that we are surrounded by micro-organisms and som
Arguments
Covid targets mainly the elderly 80% and frail 99% and the obese 80%. The elderly are disproportionately affected because they have a higher percentage of weak and frail than the young. This is so unlike past epidemics which affected everyone and usually had a average age in the 20-30year olds.
- A healthy immune system is designed to handle this virus and given the large percentage (>80%) of asymptomatics, it obviously is handing it for most people.
- Some of us may have immunity from prior corona viruses.
- Most of us have t-cell immunity as well as antibodies from recent exposure to coronavirus going back to 2005. Blood serum testing keeps showing high levels of immunity in the population.
- Vit D boosts the immune system and there may be a large population with deficient levels.
- Masks and social distancing do little to stop the spread, do not save lives
- Hospitals are running below capacity.
- Cases and fatalities peak each year around january.
- Most people do not realize the amount of deaths each day (850/day in Canada, 8k/day in US).
- in the UK, at this time, Covid is the 26th killer. Not even in the top ten.
“The largest population-based study comparing the unvaccinated/naturally immune to the vaccinated found that vaccinated people were 6 to 13 times more likely to get infected, 27 times more likely to get symptomatic infections, and 8 times more likely to be hospitalized. These findings are not surprising, since infection with the virus allows our body to form an immune response to many parts (epitopes) on the virus, whereas the vaccines expose us only to one part, the spike protein.”
The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 variant A.30 is heavily mutated and evades vaccine-induced antibodies with high efficiency
SARS-CoV-2 antibody-positivity protects against reinfection for at least seven months with 95% efficacy
vaccine
The Potential Serious Danger of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement with Coronavirus Vaccines
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. warns: Don’t take a COVID-19 vaccine under any circumstances
Dr. Carrie Madej – An Urgent Wake-Up Call About New COVID-19 Vaccine
https://visionlaunch.com/dr-carrie-madej-an-urgent-wake-up-call-about-new-covid-19-vaccine/
Location of FDA docs on C-19 vaccine
explanation of vax trials and requirements for EUA
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained
FDA’s analysis of the efficacy data from 28,207 participants 18 years of age and older without evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to dose 1 confirms the vaccine was 94.1% effective (95% confidence interval (CI) 89.3, 96.8) in preventing COVID-19 occurring at least 14 days after the second dose (with 11 COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group compared to 185 COVID-19 cases in the placebo group).
Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for an Unapproved Product Moderna
EUA order
Failure
- Vaccine value wanes after 3 months, and in some after 5-6 weeks
- Some vaccinated were counted as unvax to inflate unvax case-counts
- Vax'd within first 2 weeks were counted as unvax to attribute vax harm to the unvax'd
- Double vax testing positive 2x higher than unvax (per 100k)
- Boosted are testing positive 3x higher than unvax (per 100k)
- Most people have natural immunity by now
- More than 90% of uninfected adults show pre-existing antibody reactivity against SARSCoV2
- Natural immunity is superior to vax
- Vaccinated have 6x the infection rate compared to unvax (per 100k) Israel
- The vaccinated cannot develop “natural immunity”
- Unexplained doubling of deaths in the young 2021Q3
Evidence suggests that these vaccines can alter our innate immune response, actually producing tolerance to vaccines and infections. Study showed Pfizer vaccine produced vaccine interference and the potential for these vaccinated people to respond poorly to other vaccines, ie influenza. 76 given Pfizer LNP mRNA. Results, Lymphocyte (T-cell) counts actually decrease following vaccination. This was most pronounced during initial vaccination. T-cell responses after Moderna mRNA-1273: 24 revealed low or undetectable Th2 or CD8+ Cytotoxic T-cells following vaccination. Evidence is strong that people who have had other viral infections have a robust immunity to Sars-Cov-2 independant of the severity of infection
The EUA documents showed no statistical reduction in Covid or death when the vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups were statistically compared.
"We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. "
The Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients—A Large Population-Based Study
An interview with my pediatric cardiologist husband, Kirk Milhoan, MD, PhD, FAAP, FACC Kimberly Milhoan, MD
https://kimberlymilhoanmd.substack.com/p/myocarditis?utm_source=twitter&sd=pf&s=r
Dr. Kulvinder Kaur MD
Public Health Ontario's new report was used by politicians, media, academics to claim majority of hospitalized & ICU Covid "cases" & deaths "with Covid" are "unvaccinated"
BUT their definition for "unvaccinated" actually INCLUDES vaccinated ppl.
"Unvaccinated cases include cases that are not yet protected from immunization and are 0-13 days post-dose 1"
To make ethical evidence-based decisions, critical that all data is reported transparently: data from the control group (non-immune unvaccinated) must never be mixed with other test groups (immune unvaccinated, post-vaccination 0-13 days, post-vaccination ≥14 days)
Published Pfizer Phase 1/2 Covid vaccine clinical trial data showed dramatic transient lymphophenia (reduced white blood cells such as Tcells, NK cells, antibody producing Bcells) in ppl 1-3 days post-vaccination compared to unvaccinated control group.
Extended Data Fig. 1: Post vaccination changes in lymphocyte count over time
Phenomena of post-vaccination immunosuppression in Covid vac trials also studied with other vaccines, incl yellow fever: vaccinated ppl had increased risk of infection within 7d post-vac d/t sharp/transient lymphophenia (Tcell depletion). h/t @gerdosi
Early drop of circulating T cells negatively correlates with the protective immune response to Yellow Fever vaccination
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2020.1750249
New Peer-reviewed Canadian study in Journal of Clinical Investigation Insight: "Majority of uninfected adults show pre-existing antibody reactivity against SARSCoV2"
"Pre-existing cross-reactivity to SARSCoV2 occurs in absence of prior viral exposure"
But PHO & 🇨🇦govt’s “covid immunity taskforce” reports base “natural immunity” entirely only on humoural immunity (antibodies) and (by omission) completely deny existence of critical cellular immunity (Tcells) & secretary IgA
https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/ncov/epi/2020/12/covid-19-epi-seroprevalence-in-ontario-oct-30.pdf?sc_lang=en > https://www.covid19immunitytaskforce.ca/final-results-of-initial-canadian-sars-cov-2-seroprevalence-study-announced/
Recent pre-print of Danish study found: nursing home residents at 40% increased risk of Covid infection 0-14 days post-vac and healthcare workers at 104% increased risk of Covid infection 0-14 days post-vac respectively compared to unvaccinated people
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.08.21252200v1.full.pdf
Vaccinated people were 6.72 times more likely to get infected than those with natural immunity from prior #COVID disease.
Ontario
Confirmed Cases of COVID-19 Following Vaccination in Ontario: December 14, 2020 to March 13, 2022
During early days of the vaccine rollout (mar-july) anyone not > 14days since second dose was counted as unvaccinated which was most people. And data was showing most cases were from the unvax. Today we are seeing boosted are testing 3x higher and double 2x higher than unvax.
Most vax have natural immunity by now. Vaccine wanes after 3 months. Vaccine is doing something to reduce the immune system and govt can no longer blame it on the unvax.
To make ethical evidence-based decisions, critical that all data is reported transparently: data from the control group (non-immune unvaccinated) must never be mixed with other test groups (immune unvaccinated, post-vaccination 0-13 days, post-vaccination ≥14 days)
Published Pfizer Phase 1/2 Covid vaccine clinical trial data showed dramatic transient lymphophenia (reduced white blood cells such as Tcells, NK cells, antibody producing Bcells) in ppl 1-3 days post-vaccination compared to unvaccinated control group
(https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2639-4/figures/5)
Phenomena of post-vaccination immunosuppression in Covid vac trials also studied with other vaccines, incl yellow fever: vaccinated ppl had increased risk of infection within 7d post-vac d/t sharp/transient lymphophenia (Tcell depletion). h/t
(https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2020.1750249)
Tcells are critical for our innate & adaptive immune responses, including both cellular (CD4 and CD8 Tcells) & humoural (antibody) immune responses. Our "warrior" Tcells play a critical role in our natural immune response to viruses, including SARSCoV2
BC
A Canadian peer-reviewed study from BC also found:
-
">90% of uninfected adults show pre-existing antibody reactivity against SARSCoV2"
-
"Current study is consistent with detection of Tcell reactivity against SARSCoV2 in ~40% of uninfected individuals"
Final results of initial Canadian SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence study announced
Recent pre-print of Danish study found: nursing home residents at 40% increased risk of Covid infection 0-14 days post-vac and healthcare workers at 104% increased risk of Covid infection 0-14 days post-vac respectively compared to unvaccinated people
(https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.08.21252200v1.full.pdf) medrxiv 2021 03
"A genuine increased risk of contracting infection post vaccination is important to understand, both for evaluating the vaccination programmes as well as planning the best time of year to carry such programmes out"
According to UK government's report by its SAGE advisors released in early July 2021: "The combination of high prevalence and high levels of vaccination creates the conditions in which an immune escape variant is most likely to emerge."
Israel
Interesting thread from @prof_shahar on transparency of Covid data reporting from Israel
Interesting article posted by Harvard Professor @MartinKulldorff on Covid infections in Israel - Vaccinated people were 6.72 times more likely to get infected than those with natural immunity from prior #COVID disease.
New Zealand
Vaccinated Have Up To SIX Times the Infection Rate of Unvaccinated, New Zealand Government Data Show
- 10% of the triple vaccinated in New Zealand were infected.
- 14% of the single vaccinated were infected.
- An astounding 18% of the double vaccinated were infected.
- Yet only 3% of the unvaccinated appear to have been infected.
Israel study: the naturally immune had a:
10.5 per 100,000 infection rate 4-6 mos. following recovery, vs a
69.2 per 100,000 infection rate among vaccinated.
Original Antigenic Sin
Original Antigenic Sin is a Real and Very Serious Reason to Stop Vaccinating Everyone. Two papers discover that cross-reacting antibodies from common coronavirus infections can hinder effective antibody response to SARS-CoV-2.
(https://www.eugyppius.com/p/original-antigenic-sin-is-a-real?s=r)
This is not a crazy internet fantasy, but a well-observed limitation of human immunity. It is the primary reason that respiratory viruses like influenza return again and again. Despite multiple reinfections across the whole population, we are never quite immune to the flu, because its strategy is to exploit the way our immune systems learn.
(https://www.eugyppius.com/p/more-on-original-antigenic-sin-and?s=r)
COVID Vaccines Aren’t Working — And No Amount of Boosting Will Change That
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccines-arent-working-boosting-change/
The vaccinated cannot develop “natural immunity”, The boosted cannot clear the virus quickly upon infection, Covid virions invade and damage monocytes, the blood cells providing immunity, due to Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), leading to gradual destruction of the immune system. Sars-Cov-2 also infects immune T-cells.
(https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/aids-like-chronic-covid-is-taking?s=r)
New-onset autoimmune phenomena post-COVID-19 vaccination
(https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/imm.13443)
New Brunswick
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/what-is-going-on-in-new-brunswick?s=r
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/and-whats-going-on-in-ontario?s=r
Doubling of deaths in young
Pre-exposure to mRNA-LNP inhibits adaptive immune responses and alters innate immune fitness in an inheritable fashion https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.16.484616v2
The mRNA-LNP-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is highly inflammatory, and its synthetic ionizable lipid component responsible for the induction of inflammation has a long in vivo half-life.
Interestingly, mice pre-exposed to the mRNA-LNP platform can pass down the acquired immune traits to their offspring, providing better protection against influenza. In summary, the mRNA-LNP vaccine platform induces long-term unexpected immunological changes affecting both adaptive immune responses and heterologous protection against infections. Thus, our studies highlight the need for more research to determine this platform’s true impact on human health.
https://react19.org/1250-covid-vaccine-reports/
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-is-causing-the-died-suddenly
V-Safe Part 1: After 464 Days, CDC Finally Coughed up Covid-19 Vaccine Safety Data Showing 7.7% of People Reported Needing Medical Care https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/v-safe-part-1-after-464-days-cdc
Shedding
May Pfizer FOIA, Hepatitis in Kids, & Shedding
(from phizer dump) First, note the discussion about the RNA being translated into the cell. That is the point of mRNA, to deliver an RNA sequence into a cell so the cell produces whatever the RNA is describing. That said, here, it is admitted that the BNT161b2 version of the jab is training your body to create the SARS-CoV2 spike protein. The spike protein is part of what causes the damage when you have COVID-19 so why would you want to inject something that teaches your body to create this?
… the process of making an RNA copy of a gene’s DNA sequence. This copy, called messenger RNA (mRNA), carries the gene’s protein information encoded in DNA. In humans and other complex organisms, mRNA mo ves from the cell nucleus to the cell cytoplasm (watery interior), where it is used for synthesizing the encoded protein.” (retrieved on 5/6/2022 from https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Transcription). Reverse transcription is the opposite of this where DNA is “created” from an RNA sequence. There are substantial questions about whether the jabs may reverse transcribe their mRNA sequences into cellular DNA in a permanent way but it certainly does not appear impossible.
INTERIM CLINICAL STUDY REPORT - BNT162-01
https://tomrenz.substack.com/api/v1/file/f3bfe47e-6dc9-4ca8-b3e6-610a6b81d1ec.pdf
Health of Pure Bloods Threatened by Shedding of mRNA and Spike Protein
Why the Unvaccinated are Concerned about Close Contact with COVID-19 Vaccinated
The Impact of Pre-existing Comorbidities and Therapeutic Interventions on COVID-19
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01991/full
Physiological correlates of bereavement and the impact of bereavement interventions
Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them
The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity
VACCINE-INDUCED TURBO CANCER: T-cell lymphoma can progress rapidly due to mRNA booster shot
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-11-15-t-cell-lymphoma-progress-rapidly-mrna-booster-shot.html
Harm
"Vaccines based on mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising new platform used by two leading vaccines against COVID-19. Clinical trials and ongoing vaccinations present with varying degrees of protection levels and side effects. However, the drivers of the reported side effects remain poorly defined. Here we present evidence that Acuitas' LNPs used in preclinical nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine studies are highly inflammatory in mice. Intradermal and intramuscular injection of these LNPs led to rapid and robust inflammatory responses, characterized by massive neutrophil infiltration, activation of diverse inflammatory pathways, and production of various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. The same dose of LNP delivered intranasally led to similar inflammatory responses in the lung and resulted in a high mortality rate, with mechanism unresolved. Thus, the mRNA-LNP platforms' potency in supporting the induction of adaptive immune responses and the observed side effects may stem from the LNPs' highly inflammatory nature. "
"Should individuals who already had a SARS-CoV-2 infection receive one or two shots of the currently authorized mRNA vaccines. In this short report, we show that the antibody response to the first vaccine dose in individuals with pre-existing immunity is equal to or even exceeds the titers found in naïve individuals after the second dose. We also show that the reactogenicity is significantly higher in individuals who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the past. Changing the policy to give these individuals only one dose of vaccine would not negatively impact on their antibody titers, spare them from unnecessary pain and free up many urgently needed vaccine doses."
"People with prior COVID-19 illness appear to experience significantly increased incidence and severity of side effects after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine."
"Prior COVID-19 infection but not ongoing Long-COVID symptoms were associated with an increase in the risk of self-reported adverse events following BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination. ...The proportion reporting one moderate/severe symptom was higher in the previous COVID-19 group (56% v 47%, OR=1.5 [95%CI, 1.1–2.0], p=.009), with fever, fatigue, myalgia-arthralgia and lymphadenopathy significantly more common."
"3,078 HCW were included. Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 occurred in 396 subjects (12·9%). 59·6% suffered from ≥1 local or systemic symptom after the first and 73·4% after the second dose. MSS occurred in 6·3% of cases (14·4% with previous vs 5·1% with no COVID-19 p<0·001) and in 28·3% (24·5% in COVID-19 vs 28·3% no COVID, p = 0·074) after the first and second dose, respectively. Subjects already experiencing COVID-19 had an independent 3-fold higher risk of MSS after the first and a 30% lower risk after the second dose. No severe adverse events were reported."
"The Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and the Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) COVID-19 vaccines have shown excellent safety and efficacy in phase 3 trials. We aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines in a UK community setting."
"Since COVID-19 risk of reinfection is of great concern, the safety and efficacy of the mRNA-based vaccines in previously infected populations should be assessed. We studied 78 individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-19, who received a single dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, and 1:2 ratio matched infection-naïve cohort who received two injections."
Adverse
Examination of current literature that explores the adverse nature of these vaccines.
SPIKE PROTEIN INDUCES MYOCARDITIS
HOW THE SPIKE PROTEIN INDUCES MYOCARDITIS AND WHY I BELIEVE IT IS EXTRAORDINARILY COMMON
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Binds to Heart’s Vascular Cells Potentially Contributing to Severe Microvascular Damage. A study from February of this year proves this, and explains the observed Myocarditis.
There is now extensive research regarding the instances of Myocarditis caused by both COVID-19 and the Spike Protein therapies. However, most people view this as a “side effect” of the therapies and a pathology of the virus. The truth of the matter is, I believe they are both the EXACT same mechanism.
First of all, in addition to cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells of the cardiac (micro)vasculature are direct targets for infection. Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart that is characterized by a large diversity in symptoms varying from a SYMPTOMLESS course to shortness of breath and mild flu-like symptoms, chest pain, specific or a specific ECG changes, to acute heart failure and chronically to dilated cardiomyopathy.
In the heart, myocarditis can induce cell loss, interstitial and replacement fibrosis, wall motion abnormalities, decreased ejection fraction, and arrhythmias. Moreover, myocarditis is one of the leading causes of SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH IN YOUNG ADULTS.
The cause of myocarditis can among others be an allergic or toxic reaction to medicines and toxic drugs as well as autoimmune organ-specific myocarditis and systemic autoimmune diseases-associated myocarditis. However, most often, the cause of myocarditis is an infection, including viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and fungi.
In our case, the cause is an TRANSFECTION with the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2. The infection of the cardiac endothelium can cause among others endothelial activation, damage, and permeability. For instance, infection of cardiac endothelial cells in patients with viral myocarditis has shown to induce endothelial microparticles reflecting endothelial damage.
We also observe the classic Spike/COVID-19 inflammation and thrombi as is seen in infectious myocarditis: The putative infection, pro-inflammatory activation, and death of cardiac endothelial cells each create a potential procoagulant environment. Indeed, occlusive thrombi, fibrin deposits, and aggregated platelets have been found in the small epicardial and intramyocardial vasculature of T. cruzi-infected mice and dogs and in mice with CVB3-induced myocarditis.
Clearly, the coronary (micro)vasculature plays a prominent role in the different stages of the disease; initially as a barrier against and as a target for infection, and subsequently as an important factor in the shaping of the immune response in the heart and as an important determinant of dysfunction of the heart. As such, these changes in the coronary (micro)vasculature may explain, in part, the wide variety of clinical symptoms in infectious myocarditis patients from COVID-19 and Spike Protein therapies.
https://twitter.com/Parsifaler/status/1500660491559051268
Infectious myocarditis: the role of the cardiac vasculature
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2
[Massive Nordic study finds risk of post-vaccination myo/pericarditis resulting in hospitalization in males 16-24 of 380/million (1/2600) post pfizer-moderna combination. This is 28x higher than the 13.7/million rate they found post-covid🧵https://t.co/oIhI5GcimH — Tracy Høeg, MD, PhD (@TracyBethHoeg) April 22, 2022
gene based injections
https://remnantmd.substack.com/
5.6 per million adverse events reported in 2019
https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/data-and-analysis/infectious-disease/vaccine-safety#/trends
4 million doses in children needed to prevent 1 icu admission
https://www.statsjamie.co.uk/4-million-doses-in-children-needed-to-prevent-1-icu-admission/
vaers analysis
https://twitter.com/joshg99/status/1495048760807862275
https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/the-israeli-ministry-of-health-actually-db7?utm_source=url
Israeli Ministry of Health
Some top-line numbers of adverse events reported 3-4 weeks following booster vaccination. Per million doses:
| quantity | event |
|---|---|
| 5,000 | Hospitalizations |
| 1,464 | Herpes Zoster cases |
| 5,268 | Bell's Palsy cases |
| 1,952 | Seizures/Convulsions |
| 56,567 | Menstrual Disruptions |
Ontario Adverse Events 2022 Apr 4
What they define as Severe or Unusual
Excess deaths
HowBad.info
https://howbad.info/1000studies.pdf
"Our study indicates that BNT162b2 vaccine–induced myocarditis in adolescents appears to be a rare adverse event that occurs predominantly in males after the second vaccine dose. The clinical course appears to be mild and benign over a follow-up period of 6 months, and cardiac imaging findings suggest a favorable long-term prognosis."